Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't the house that Kendall and Zach so dramatically burned down owned by Tad? I was stunned thinking of all the old furniture and belongings and possible resale value just going up in adulterous flames... Only is Soapland... But wait I must get back to the PRISON YARD RAP/DANCE OFF SCENE playing now!!
>^..^<
Posted by: elma Date posted: Fri Apr 25 19:58:54 2008
Message: Exactly, I kept thinking about the good uses that dwelling and its furnishing could have been put to. Plus, GREENwise, think of all the carbon emisions. Kinda hypocritcal to make commercials for soapnet telling viewers to turn off their lights when you have major characters light up the sky with ash and coals! Jeepers.
Kendall has a history of setting crap on fire. She did it to her motel room (twice, I think) upon her return to Pine Valley - although it was accidental.
Not to mention Bianca started a fire when she was little. Maybe it's genetic?
Posted by: Doowop Betty Date posted: Fri Apr 25 13:53:56 2008
Message: The way I see it, that's the second house Tad lost to arson this year; first Adam burned his house down and nothing was ever said about it, and now Kendall and Zack decided to burn down the 'investment property' Tad bought - hahahahaha. It's so ludicrous, it's embarrassing. But I, like most of the rest of us, am hooked. What can I do,,,,,,,,,,,, Doowopper
